# Khadur Sahib: Where the Story Begins

*An ancestral town, a childhood city, and what each kind of belonging permits*

Kanwar Partap Singh Gill, MD · November 5, 2026 · Roots

Throughout my school and college years in Amritsar, Khadur Sahib was in Amritsar district. Since 2006 it has belonged to Tarn Taran, a new district carved out of the old one that year, and the name Khadur Sahib now also labels a tehsil and a development block of the new district, as well as a parliamentary constituency, created in the delimitation of 2008, that reaches as far as Kapurthala and Zira. Nothing physical happened. The gurdwaras stayed where they were, and so did the fields and the road running on toward the Beas. Only the lines drawn around them moved. Anyone who learned the map of Punjab before 2006 has had a small reflex to correct ever since.

I am fond of that correction, more than its size deserves. It asks nothing of anyone except a willingness to be updated, and it is the kind of fact on which respect for a place is easiest to practise and easiest to neglect. A family can carry the name of a town for generations and be wrong about which district it is in. The town will not mind. But the error is a small symptom of something larger: the place being carried has stopped, in the carrier's mind, at a particular date, and has quietly been excused from the obligation to change.

That larger thing is my subject here. "Where the story begins" is an easy phrase to write and a harder one to mean, because a life has more than one kind of beginning, and the kinds do not testify to the same things. My family's roots are in Khadur Sahib. I grew up in Amritsar. Both sentences are true. They are true in different ways, and most of what follows is an attempt to keep them from collapsing into each other.

## Two Beginnings

Short biographies prefer a single origin. An author's note, an obituary, the line beneath a byline: each has room for one town, and the town it chooses becomes, by repetition, the place a person is "from." The convention is harmless until one notices what it does. It lends whatever town it names the authority of a witnessed life, and it silently removes the other places that did the work of forming one. Compression is a kind of editing, and editing always has a point of view.

Written one after the other, my two sentences look like a single fact stated twice. They describe different relationships. Nobody had to tell me about the city I grew up in. I knew it before I knew that I knew it. Its distances, its noise, its unwritten permissions, the hours at which its streets fill and empty, were learned the way a first language is learned: without lessons and without any memory of having been taught. Much of what I know about Amritsar cannot be traced to a source at all, except the plain one of having been there.

An ancestral town arrives the other way round. Nearly everything a person knows about it comes from being told: by family, by tradition, by the written record, by the signboards passed on the way to somewhere else. It is possible to carry such a place for a lifetime without having grown up in it, in much the way one carries a surname. The name was given before it could be chosen. What one does with it is the part that is chosen.

Punjabi has a question that keeps these relations apart more tidily than English does. Ask an American where he is from and he will usually give the town where he lives, or the one where he went to high school. In Punjab a person can live an entire life in a city and still be asked about their pind (ਪਿੰਡ), their village, and the question will have nothing to do with their address. It asks where the family comes from. The fuller phrase is jaddī pind (ਜੱਦੀ ਪਿੰਡ). Jaddī came into Punjabi, as into Urdu, from the Arabic jadd, which John Platts's dictionary of Urdu and Hindi glosses as a grandfather or an ancestor; the adjective it gives as "ancestral, belonging to ancestors." The phrase is honest about its own evidence. It does not say *my village*. It says *the ancestors' village*, and it names the line of transmission inside the words.

There is a second honesty in it that I did not appreciate until I went looking for numbers. People say jaddī pind even when the place is, by any ordinary measure, a town, and I had assumed that Khadur Sahib was an instance of that affectionate looseness. The census disagrees with me. In 2011 the Census of India counted Khadur Sahib as a village, a large one, of 11,054 people in 2,027 households, administered through a sarpanch. Some reference works now describe it as a nagar panchayat, a small municipality, and the word one uses depends on which register one consults and when. The family word turns out to have been more exact than my correction of it.

Punjabi has another word that sits beside pind in any dictionary: ਪਿੰਡਾ, pindā, the body. I will claim no more for the neighbourhood than that. Platts's dictionary, which records Urdu and Hindi and not Punjabi usage, gives *piṇḍ* as a round mass, a cluster, a collection, and also the body, and it does not mention villages at all, so I have no warrant to say that one word grew out of the other. But the adjacency is useful to a physician. What I know of Amritsar I know in the pindā, in the legs that learned its distances and the skin that learned its heat. What I know of Khadur Sahib as an ancestral town I know as a pind: a name, a cluster of facts and stories handed down by others. Both are real, and only one of them is the memory of a childhood.

## Collateral History

Medicine has given me a habit of mind that is useful well outside the clinic. The standard written history begins, before a single symptom is recorded, with a line about its source and its reliability. *History obtained from the patient, who is a reliable historian.* *History provided by a daughter who lives with him.* *Per outside records.* Information that comes from someone other than the patient has a name, collateral history, and it is often indispensable: the wife who noticed the confusion before the husband did, the son who knows which pills are actually taken. It is also labelled, because it differs in kind. It has passed through another person's attention and another person's worry. Sometimes it is more accurate than the patient's own account and sometimes less. A careful clinician neither discards it nor mistakes it for an examination.

What I know about Khadur Sahib can be sorted the same way, and I think it ought to be. Each kind of knowledge can carry a certain weight and no more.

Some of it is documentary. The census can tell me how many people lived in the town in 2011 and how many of them could read; it cannot tell me which of them are kin to anyone. Punjab's land records are older and stranger than most people realise. In revenue language a village is an *estate*, and its principal record is the jamabandi (ਜਮ੍ਹਾਬੰਦੀ), the record of rights, which lists owners and cultivators field by field; the land records manual reproduced on the website of Punjab's revenue department speaks of drawing up a complete jamabandi for each estate once in four years. Such a record can establish who held which field in a given agricultural year. It cannot say why anyone left, or what they took with them when they did. Even official documents are kept by people. The tally of a new district's tehsils is itself an administrative decision, revised as boundaries are redrawn and not always in step from one official summary to the next, which is oddly consoling.

Some of what I know is Sikh tradition, held by an entire community and far larger than any family's share in it: that this was the town of Guru Angad Dev, the second Guru, and that eight of the ten Gurus are remembered as having come here. Tradition establishes what a community remembers and honours. It does not establish what a particular household did, and it should not be asked to.

Some of it is the private knowledge a family keeps about its own connection to a place. That knowledge belongs to the family. It does not become history by being published on a website, and I have deliberately not set it down here. It can establish relation and affection; it is sometimes exact about names and vague about dates; it has the strengths and the weaknesses of every account that passes through love.

And some of it, for an ancestral town, is simply absent. I have no childhood in Khadur Sahib to recollect. To say so is not a confession. It is the line at the top of the history, filled in correctly.

The categories matter because each is damaged when it is passed off as one of the others. The temptation for anyone whose family comes from a town like Khadur Sahib is to let the town's public meaning lend itself to the private story, until a family connection begins to sound like a credential. It is not one. The town's place in Sikh memory belongs to every Sikh who bows there, whether they come from the next village or from the far side of the world, and none of them needs my family to have been there for it to matter. My connection is a fact about my family. It is smaller than the town's history, and no less real for being small.

The name itself carries evidence of the same mixed kinds. I do not know what *Khadur* means, and I have not found a source I would trust to tell me; it is an older word than the history most people now associate with it. The part of the name I can read is the suffix. *Sahib* is the honorific joined to the names of places associated with the Gurus, and it is the town's public history written into its address. The name, in other words, has two layers: an older word I cannot gloss, and a later one recording what Sikhs remember. My family appears in neither, which is as it should be. The name records what the town means to Sikhs, and that is a larger thing than what it means to any one household.

## The Home of the Homeless

The public history, read carefully, has something to say to anyone tempted to treat an origin as an honour.

Guru Angad was not born in Khadur. Bhai Lehna, as he was known before the guruship, was born in 1504 at Matte di Sarai, now Sarai Naga in Muktsar district; the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee's account says that his family left their ancestral village and resettled at Khadur, beside the Beas. He married Khivi, whose family came from Sanghar, near Khadur. He went to Guru Nanak at Kartarpur as a seeker, was installed as successor in 1539, and afterwards came back to Khadur, where he lived until his death in 1552. The town whose name now carries his memory received him, in the first place, as a member of a family that had arrived from somewhere else. The chapter of its history that Sikhs remember begins with a resettlement.

The episode Khadur keeps most vividly concerns a man who belonged there even less. Amar Das was born in 1479 at Basarke, a village in what is now Amritsar district. Already about sixty, by the reckoning of those dates, he was brought to Guru Angad at Khadur and stayed, the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism records, for twelve years of service: fetching water from the river for the Guru's bath before dawn, working in the communal kitchen, gathering firewood. On one stormy night, carrying water from the Beas through the weavers' quarter, he stumbled over a peg and fell, without spilling the pitcher. A weaver woman, woken by the noise, called out a name meant to wound: *Amaru nithāvāṅ*, Amaru the homeless, the man with no place of his own. When Guru Angad heard of it, he answered with a string of epithets, among them the honour of the unhonoured and the home of the homeless. Amar Das became the third Guru. The tradition says that the night settled the succession. The man mocked as placeless then made his seat a few miles away at Goindwal, at a ferry on the Beas where the road between Lahore and Delhi crossed the river, and the same encyclopaedia counts him among the builders of that town.

I have no wish to turn a sacred memory into a parable about genealogy, and what the story means within Sikh devotion is larger than anything I draw from it here. But a reader whose family name runs through this town cannot help noticing which way the story points. In the town's most celebrated scene of belonging, the claim from place is the insult, and it is spoken by a resident. The answer does not dispute that the man was placeless. It relocates the idea of a home, out of birth and residence and into service. Whatever authority Khadur Sahib confers, on this telling, it confers on the one who carried the water. The town's other famous institution makes the same point without words. The langar for which Khadur is also remembered, the communal kitchen associated with Mata Khivi, does not ask anyone sitting in its rows which village they come from.

The community's liturgy points the same way. The Ardas set out in the Sikh Rehat Maryada, the code of conduct published under the authority of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, includes a petition for unobstructed visits to Nankana Sahib and the other shrines and places of the Guru from which the Panth has been separated, and for their free management. What is asked for, on behalf of an entire people separated from some of its most sacred ground, is access and the right to look after. It is not a deed. The relationship to place that the prayer imagines is a duty of care.

Punjab's Sufi poets carried the same suspicion of origin into another register. In one of Bulleh Shah's best-known kafis, whose refrain asks who can know who I am, the verses run through a list of identities the poet declines: he is not an Arab and not of Lahore, not of Hind and not of the city of Nagaur, neither Hindu nor a Turk of Peshawar. For Bulleh Shah, who died at Kasur in 1757, the refusal is mystical, a clearing of the ground for a self that no place or creed can contain, and I do not want to recruit a Sufi's search for God into an argument about genealogy. But it is striking how often the region's devotional poetry treats the answer *I am from such a place* as the beginning of a misunderstanding.

That is a demanding standard for a descendant to hold himself to, and I mean it to be. If the town's own memory measures belonging by service, then the person who invokes the town from a distance has taken on, at the least, the duties that cost nothing: to be accurate about it, to be curious about it, and to refuse the kind of pride that would have embarrassed the people the town remembers.

## The Family History

There is one more place in medicine where ancestry is written down, and it teaches a stricter lesson than the courtesies of collateral history. Every chart has a section for the family history. It records that a father had a heart attack at forty-six, that a mother developed diabetes in her fifties, that an aunt had a cancer whose name the patient never learned. Physicians ask because the answers matter. An illness in a parent or a sibling changes what we watch for, when we test, and how we read a result that sits near the line. Ancestry in the wider sense matters as well; clinicians have long recognised that some conditions are more common in people of particular origins, and that a measurement which reassures in one population may reassure less in another.

But the family history has a precise grammatical status, and good clinicians keep to it. It is a statement about probability. It moves the starting point of an inquiry and does not complete one. A man whose father died young of heart disease carries a higher chance of the same illness than a man whose father did not. He does not, by virtue of that history, have the illness, and a physician who treated the inheritance as a finding would be making the same error, in the opposite direction, as one who ignored it. Statisticians call such a starting point a prior. The discipline of the clinic is to let the prior shape the questions and then to let the examination answer them.

The section has a further humility built into it. Family histories are themselves collateral, and often uncertain. Patients are frequently unsure what exactly a grandparent died of; "something with the heart" is a common and perfectly honest answer. The record keeps the uncertainty instead of resolving it by guesswork, because a confident wrong entry will be copied forward for years.

The model transfers to an ancestral town with surprising ease. Khadur Sahib belongs, in this sense, to my family history. It shifts the probabilities about what I care for, which words move me, which stories I was told and therefore tend to tell. It is a strong prior. It is not a finding about what I have seen. The person who confuses the two in medicine over-diagnoses; the person who confuses them in memoir over-claims. The opposite error is real too. A descendant who, embarrassed by sentiment, dismisses the ancestral town as mere hearsay has ignored something true about himself. Family history is not nothing. It is labelled, and the label is part of its truth.

## A Town With Its Own Calendar

To people who live elsewhere, Khadur Sahib is an origin. To the people who live there, it is an address. It has a sarpanch or a committee, depending on which year's arrangement one consults; roads that need repair; school timetables; shop hours; and arguments about matters that will never appear in anyone's memoir. A place that is constantly remembered from abroad can be quietly flattened into a symbol, and symbols are seldom asked how they are doing.

The town does not, in any case, live only on its past. One of the most visible institutions associated with its name is the Kar Sewa of Khadur Sahib, led by Baba Sewa Singh, whose environmental work has been honoured in India and abroad. The Kar Sewa restores and builds gurdwaras and runs schools and colleges; since 1999 it has also been planting trees along the roads of the Majha and well beyond. In June 2021 *The Tribune*'s local column, "Tarn Taran Diary," put the count at more than five lakh trees across some 475 villages and about 500 kilometres of road, and mentioned, almost in passing, an orchard of thirty-six kinds of fruit tree beside a gurdwara in the town and a hockey academy there. This seems to me instructive. While descendants abroad were writing about roots as a figure of speech, the town was in the business of putting real ones into the ground.

After the trees and a profile of a district officer, the same column carried a reader's complaint about a bridge on a village link road elsewhere in the district that had gone without a railing for more than thirty years. That is what a district sounds like when it talks to itself: trees, officials, a bridge, a grievance. No origin story sounds like that, which is part of why it rings true.

There are other calendars too, and they are not ceremonial. The 2011 census recorded a literacy rate for the town a little below the state's. The constituency that has borne the town's name since 2008 sends a member to Parliament, and its elections are reported across Punjab in terms that have nothing to do with anyone's family, and which a writer in Fresno is badly placed to judge. Young people there make decisions about schooling and work and leaving that are entirely their own, and some of them will one day be asked, in another country, where they are from. Their answers will be as complicated as mine, and they will owe me no consultation.

None of this is especially remarkable. That is its importance. An ancestral town that is allowed to be ordinary has been allowed to be real. What is owed to it, from a distance, is the minimum of attention that one would give to any living place: the right district, the right spelling, an honest sense of scale, and an assumption that whatever one last heard about it is already out of date.

## What Distance Keeps

Migration is a kind of filter, and it is worth asking what it lets through. Names survive transmission very well. So do founding stories, the dates of festivals, the image of a gurdwara at dusk, a phrase in a grandparent's mouth. What does not survive is the texture of the present: the price of onions, the new bus stand, which shop closed, who quarrelled with whom about the drain. Ceremony travels; routine stays home. Over a generation or two, the town carried abroad becomes mostly sacred geography and family legend, while the town itself goes on being mostly routine.

Psychology described the mechanism nearly a century ago. In *Remembering* (1932), Frederic Bartlett, working at Cambridge, described asking people to read a folk tale from a tradition unfamiliar to them, "The War of the Ghosts," and to reproduce it: some of them repeatedly, over months and years, and some in chains, each person retelling what the last had told. The stories grew shorter. Details that connected to nothing in the reteller's experience dropped out. Strange elements were explained into something sensible, a process Bartlett called rationalisation, and in the chains the tale was quickly reshaped toward forms its new tellers already knew. Remembering, he concluded, is an imaginative reconstruction, not the retrieval of a fixed trace.

A family's story about a town is a serial reproduction conducted across generations and, for emigrants, across countries. Each retelling happens further from the place and nearer to the teller's present needs. What survives is what the new setting can hold: the name, the gurdwara, the founding date, a picture of fields. What drops away is whatever has no anchor in the teller's life, such as the particular road, the neighbour's quarrel, and above all the town's own changes after the family left. The story drifts, too, toward the conventional forms of the new country's nostalgia: the unchanging village, the simple life, the place where everything began. None of this requires anyone to lie. It is what memory does to a story when it carries it a long way.

Salman Rushdie described the result with great precision in "Imaginary Homelands," an essay first published in the *London Review of Books* in October 1982. Writers who look back from abroad, he argued, are likely to make "not actual cities or villages, but invisible ones, imaginary homelands, Indias of the mind." The essay is not a lament. Rushdie's point is that the emigrant's partial, fragmentary memory has its own kind of truth, and that the fragments take on a weight they never had when they were part of a whole. I think that is right, and I think it is also the danger. A fragment that has acquired symbolic weight is hard to correct. The emigrant's Khadur Sahib may be beautiful and true in its parts, and still be wrong about the district.

The filter has a material form as well, and Punjab's villages display it. In February 2025 *The Tribune* reported from Dosanjh Kalan, a village in the Doaba's Jalandhar district, that roughly four hundred of its thousand or so houses stood locked because their owners had gone abroad, some of them shut for more than a decade, ringed with barbed wire and cameras, while residents spoke of "eerie silence and a feeling of abandonment." I do not mean to mock such houses. They are built from real attachment and paid for with real sacrifice, and their owners' affection for the village is not in doubt. But they make a certain kind of belonging visible: a claim maintained in brick and kept under lock, while the life of the place goes on around it and occasionally past it.

All this precision invites a reasonable complaint. Precision can sound like coldness. Families use hometown language loosely, and the looseness is the point. When an elder says *we are from Khadur Sahib*, he is not making a claim that awaits verification; he is binding a grandchild in Fresno or Toronto to a line of people and a patch of earth, and the binding is an act of love. To answer that sentence with *strictly speaking, our roots are there* is to behave like a man correcting the pronunciation of a blessing. Worse, the insistence on distinctions can be a way of keeping a place at arm's length: the emigrant protecting himself from the claims of the town by turning it into a problem of evidence. And the tradition itself, as I have just described it, measures belonging by love and service, not by documents. By what right does a descendant demand footnotes?

I take the objection seriously, and I think it is correct about speech and mistaken about writing. In the mouth of an elder, *we are from Khadur Sahib* is an embrace, and it would be absurd to audit it. On a page that strangers read, the same sentence becomes a claim, and claims are read as testimony. A reader cannot hear the affection in a printed sentence. He hears the assertion, and he is entitled to assume that a person who says *I am from there* grew up there. The distinctions I have been drawing are not an alternative to the warmth of the family phrase. They are what that warmth has to become when it is written down in public, if it is not to borrow an authority it does not have.

Nor does affection give a returning descendant authority over residents. This is the quieter half of the objection's error. A person may carry a place with great love and still have no standing to tell the people who live there what it is, what it should become, or what it used to be like. Love of an ancestral town, done properly, makes a person a better listener there, not a better informant.

## What a Root Does

The word *roots* makes a human life sound tidier than it is. A tree stays where it was planted. People acquire passports, qualifications, storage boxes and increasingly elaborate answers to the question of where they are from. The tree has a considerable administrative advantage.

Still, the metaphor holds up better than it first appears, provided the botany is right. Roots are mostly out of sight. They do not commemorate the spot where a tree began; they are how it goes on drawing from the ground, and they keep growing for as long as the tree is alive. The banyan, the bohṛ (ਬੋਹੜ) that shades many a Punjabi village, goes further. It lets roots down from its branches, and where they reach the soil they thicken into new trunks, so that a single tree can spread a long way from where it started and remain one tree.

The Punjabi tradition supplies the necessary correction to that consoling picture. Among the shaloks of Baba Farid preserved in the Guru Granth Sahib is one that asks how long a tree on a riverbank can keep its hold, and in the same breath how long water can be kept in a pot of unfired clay. Farid's subject is mortality, and the shalok should be left with its own gravity. But the image is exact about rivers, and Khadur Sahib stands near the Beas. Roots are not a guarantee. They are a relation with ground that is itself moving. A tree on a bank holds by continuing to hold, and the bank does not promise to stay.

That seems to me the truest thing the metaphor can say about an ancestral town. The connection is real, and it is not a possession. It has to be kept up by attention, the way a root keeps up its grip by growing, and it can be lost by neglect even when no one has gone anywhere. A family that stops asking about a place, or asks only about its past, has let go of the bank while still telling the story of the tree.

## A Precise Introduction

What, then, does belonging at a distance actually require? Less than the grand language of roots suggests, and more than its sentimental uses allow.

It requires accurate words. I can write the name correctly in both scripts, ਖਡੂਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ and Khadur Sahib. I can say *my family's roots are there*, which is true, in preference to *I am from there*, which would need a footnote. I can keep what I was told apart from what I know, and both apart from what Sikhs everywhere remember, without ranking them. Collateral history is still history. It only has to be labelled.

It requires curiosity about the present, of the unglamorous kind. Which district, which tehsil, which constituency; whether the census calls the place a village and what the residents call it; what the Kar Sewa is planting this year; what the young people there are leaving for, and what some of them are coming back to. These are not the questions that make for an inspiring origin story. They are the questions one asks about a place one takes seriously.

It requires a willingness to be corrected, and to be corrected especially by people who live there and owe the descendant nothing. The habit of updating a district name is a small rehearsal for that larger humility. To belong at a distance is partly to accept that the next fact learned about the place may revise the story already being told, and to welcome the revision instead of defending the story.

It also requires noticing that the two beginnings make different demands. The city of a childhood makes its claims on memory: it asks to be remembered truly, without the softening that time applies to every street one no longer has to cross in the heat. The ancestral town makes its claims on conduct. It cannot ask to be remembered as a childhood is remembered, since it was not the place of one; it can only ask to be treated well by those who invoke it, in their words and in whatever they do in its name. The first obligation is discharged by honesty about the past. The second is discharged, if at all, in the present tense.

And it requires a sense of proportion about one's own place in the town's account. My family is a strand in Khadur Sahib's long life. The town is a strand in my family's. Neither is the whole of the other, and the town's most famous story warns against confusing a claim of origin with a claim of honour.

So the introduction I would offer, if anyone asked, is short and has two clauses. My family's roots are in Khadur Sahib, in what is now Tarn Taran district. I grew up in Amritsar. The first clause is a relation and the second is a memory, and neither needs to borrow the other's evidence. The story begins in both places, in different senses of the word, and the honest thing is to say which sense is meant.

Somewhere along a Majha road there is a line of trees put in by people from Khadur Sahib who did not need my family's story, or this essay, to know why a tree is worth planting. Tarn Taran district, then. I have made the correction. The town, I suspect, did not notice.

## Evidence and Editorial Note

**Documented findings.** Public biography: family roots in Khadur Sahib; upbringing and schooling in Amritsar; practice in California since 2010, with Fresno as home base. Formation of Tarn Taran district from Amritsar district in 2006, and Khadur Sahib as a tehsil and development block of the new district: the Tarn Taran district administration's website (tarntaran.nic.in),  and standard reference sources. Khadur Sahib parliamentary constituency created in the 2008 delimitation, with assembly segments as far as Kapurthala and Zira: standard reference sources on the constituency. Khadur Sahib's 2011 census figures (11,054 persons in 2,027 households, listed as a large village administered through a sarpanch): Census of India 2011 data as presented by census2011.co.in and citypopulation.de; its description as a nagar panchayat and its literacy rate (73.45 per cent against 75.84 for Punjab): standard reference sources. *Jaddī* from Arabic *jadd*, "a grandfather, an ancestor," glossed "ancestral, belonging to ancestors," and the entries for *piṇḍ* and *piṇḍā* (mass, cluster, body; no sense "village"): John T. Platts, *A Dictionary of Urdu, Classical Hindi, and English* (1884), Digital Dictionaries of South Asia, University of Chicago. The jamabandi as the record of rights, the village as an "estate," and a complete jamabandi once in four years: the land records manual reproduced on the Punjab Revenue Department's website (it may not reflect current practice in every particular). Guru Angad's birth in 1504 at Matte di Sarai (Sarai Naga), his family's resettlement at Khadur beside the Beas, his marriage to Khivi of Sanghar, his succession in 1539 and his death at Khadur in 1552: the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee's biography (sgpc.net) and the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Punjabi University) as published at thesikhencyclopedia.com. Guru Amar Das's birth at Basarke in 1479, his twelve years of service at Khadur, the weaver's peg, the epithet "Amaru Nithavan," Guru Angad's reply naming him "the home of the homeless," and his later seat at Goindwal on the Delhi–Lahore road at a ferry on the Beas: the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism entry on Guru Amar Das. Khadur's association with Mata Khivi and langar: standard Sikh historical reference sources. The Ardas petition for unobstructed visits to and free management of Nankana Sahib and other separated shrines: the Sikh Rehat Maryada (Article IV) in English translation. Baba Sewa Singh and the Kar Sewa of Khadur Sahib (gurdwara restoration, schools and colleges, tree-planting since 1999): standard reference sources; the figures of more than five lakh trees, some 475 villages and about 500 kilometres of road, the orchard near Gurdwara Tapiana Sahib, the hockey academy, honours in India and abroad, and the reader's complaint about a bridge without a railing for over thirty years: *The Tribune*, "Tarn Taran Diary," 17 June 2021. Locked houses in Dosanjh Kalan, Jalandhar district, and the quoted phrase: *The Tribune*, report by Deepkamal Kaur, 9 February 2025. Frederic Bartlett, *Remembering* (Cambridge, 1932), and the serial-reproduction findings with "The War of the Ghosts": a published summary by McGraw Hill Canada of Bartlett's study. Bulleh Shah (d. 1757, Kasur) and the list of declined identities in the kafi known by its refrain "Bulleh, who knows who I am": the traditional text of the kafi, paraphrased in English. Rushdie, "Imaginary Homelands," *London Review of Books*, 7 October 1982 (collected 1991): quotation checked against a published citation. Baba Farid's shalok on the tree on the riverbank and the unfired clay pot: Guru Granth Sahib, Ang 1382, as presented with translation at SriGranth.org (described, not quoted). The banyan's aerial roots forming secondary trunks: standard botanical knowledge. The "source and reliability" heading of a clinical history, collateral history, and the family history as a statement of probability: standard clinical practice. **Vendor representations.** None.

**Recollection and tradition.** The author's family roots in Khadur Sahib and his Amritsar upbringing are his published biography. The lives of Guru Angad Dev and Guru Amar Das at Khadur, including the episode of the weaver's peg, are Sikh tradition as recorded in the sources named above; the remembrance that eight of the ten Gurus came to Khadur is Sikh tradition. No specific remembered scene, family account, relative, conversation or visit is described, and the essay deliberately does not state what any family account contains.

**Analysis and forecast.** The distinction between an ancestral town and a childhood city, the comparison with collateral history, the remarks on *pind* and *pindā*, the readings of Rushdie, Farid and Bulleh Shah, the reading of the Amar Das episode and the Ardas as bearing on belonging, and the reply to the objection that precision is cold are personal interpretation as of November 6, 2026, offered alongside, not in place of, their meaning within Sikh tradition. **Independence.** This essay is not sponsored by any institution, company, health system or technology developer.



## Related reading

- [Going Back](https://personal.kpsgill.com/essays/going-back/)
- [Leaving India](https://personal.kpsgill.com/essays/leaving-india/)
- [Two Countries in One Body](https://personal.kpsgill.com/essays/two-countries-in-one-body/)